Contact l Sitemap

home industries issues reasearch weblog press

Home  » Issues » Trade Justice

WORLD: Doha's Kamikaze Capitalists

by Naomi KleinToronto Globe & Mail
November 7th, 2001

What do you call someone who believes so firmly in the promise of salvation through a set of rigid rules that he is willing to risk his own life to spread those rules?

A religious fanatic? A holy warrior? How about a U.S. trade negotiator?

On Friday, the World Trade Organization begins its meeting in Doha, Qatar. According to U.S. security briefings, there is reason to believe that al-Qaeda, which has plenty of fans in the Persian Gulf state, has managed to get some of its operatives into the country, including an explosives specialist. Some terrorists may even have infiltrated the Qatari military.

Given these threats, you might think that the United States and the WTO would have canceled the meeting. But not these true believers.

Instead, U.S. delegates have been kitted out with gas masks, two-way radios and drugs to combat bioterrorism. (Canadian delegates have been issued the drugs as well.) As negotiators wrangle over agricultural subsidies, softwood lumber and pharmaceutical patents, helicopters will be waiting to whisk U.S. Delegates onto aircraft carriers parked in the Persian Gulf, ready for a Batman-style getaway.

It's safe to say that Doha isn't your average trade negotiation; it's something new. Call it Kamikaze Capitalism.

Last week, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick praised his delegation for being willing to "sacrifice" in the face of such "undoubted risks." Why are they doing it? Probably for the same reason people have always put their lives on the line for a cause: They believe in a set of rules that promises transcendence.

In this case, the god is economic growth, and it promises to save us from global recession. New markets to access, new sectors to privatize, new regulations to slash -- these will get those arrows in the corner of our television screens pointing heavenward once again.

Of course growth cannot be created at a meeting, but Doha can accomplish something else, something more religious than economic. It can send "a sign" to the market, a sign that growth is on the way, that expansion is just around the corner. And an ambitious new round of WTO negotiations is the sign they are praying for.

For rich countries like ours, the desire for this sign is desperate. It is more pressing than any possible problems with current WTO rules, problems mostly raised by poor countries, fed up with a system that has pushed them to drop their trade barriers while rich countries kept theirs up.

So it's no surprise that poor countries are this round's strongest opponents. Before they agree to drastically expand the WTO's reach, many are asking rich countries to make good on their promises from the last round.

There are major disputes swirling around agricultural subsidies and dumping, about tariffs on garments, and the patenting of life forms. The most contentious issue is drug patents. India, Brazil, Thailand and a coalition of African countries want clear language stating that patents can be overridden to protect public health. The U.S. and Canada are not just resisting -- they are resisting even as their own delegates head for Qatar popping discount Cipros, muscled out of Bayer using exactly the kind of pressure tactics they are calling unfair trade practices.

These concerns are not reflected in the draft ministerial declaration. Which is why Nigeria just blasted the WTO for being "one-sided" and "disregarding the concerns of the developing and least developed countries." India's WTO ambassador said last week that the draft "gives the uncomfortable impression that there is no serious attempt to bring issues of importance to developing countries into the mainstream."

These protests have made little impression in Geneva. Growth is the only god at these negotiations and any measures that could slow profits even slightly -- of drug companies, of water companies, of oil companies -- are being treated by believers as if they are on the side of the infidels and evildoers.

What we are witnessing is trade being "bundled" (Microsoft-style) inside the with-us-or-against logic of the war on terrorism. Last week, Mr. Zoellick explained that "by promoting the WTO's agenda... these 142 nations can counter the revulsive destructionism of terrorism." Open markets, he said, are "an antidote" to the terrorists' "violent rejectionism." (Fittingly, these are non-arguments glued together with made-up words.)

He further called on WTO member states to set aside their petty concerns about mass poverty and AIDS and join the economic front of America's war. "We hope the representatives who meet in Doha will perceive the larger stakes," he said.

Trade negotiations are all about power and opportunity, and for the Doha's Kamikaze Capitalists, terrorism is just another opportunity to leverage.

Perhaps their motto can be: What doesn't kill us will make us stronger. Much stronger.





This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.