WASHINGTON -- A Halliburton Co. subsidiary paid bribes totaling $2.4
million to a tax official in Nigeria in an effort to obtain favorable
tax treatment, the company has revealed.
In a filing Thursday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
Houston-based firm said a foreign subsidiary made improper payments
to "an entity owned by a Nigerian national who held himself out as a
tax consultant, when in fact he was an employee of a local tax
The bribes were paid over a year's time, between 2001 and 2002, a
company spokeswoman said.
Halliburton officials said they learned of the bribes while
conducting a routine audit of the operation, a subsidiary of
Halliburton's KBR, formerly known as Kellogg Brown & Root.
Several employees were fired after the discovery. No senior officers
were involved, the company said.
Halliburton officials are trying to determine how much in back taxes
the company owes Nigeria.
The company could have to pay as much as $5 million in additional
taxes, the filing said.
While news of the bribery payments drew attention Thursday, the
company publicly announced the details of the bribery incident a year
ago in a similar filing with the SEC.
A spokesman for the SEC declined to comment on the bribery incident.
The Houston-based engineering, construction and oil-field service
giant has been involved in a number of projects in Nigeria, including
the construction of a huge liquefied natural gas plant and
development of an offshore oil and gas facility.
Nigeria, when it comes to corruption, routinely scores near the
bottom on surveys of world business leaders.
In last year's Corruption Perceptions Index, published by
Berlin-based Transparency International, Nigeria ranked 101 out of
102, beating out only Bangladesh.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.