A United Nations-appointed study team has labeled
the World Trade Organization a ''nightmare'' for developing countries
and suggested the body should be brought under the U.N.'s purview.
In a report presented this week to the U.N.'s sub-commission on
protection of human rights and made available on Friday, the team also
dismisses the WTO's open trading rules as based ''on grossly unfair and
even prejudiced'' assumptions.
The report also calls for a ''radical review of the whole system of
trade liberalization'' and critical consideration of whether it is
geared toward shared benefits ''for rich and poor countries alike.''
But although it echoes criticism of the trade body from Western
anti-globalization groupings, the 40-page report rejects the idea many
of these groupings promote of linking trade rules to human rights,
labor and environmental standards.
Many ''civil society'' groups in developing countries also oppose such
linkage, arguing that it would provide Western countries with an excuse
to put up more barriers against goods from poorer states.
The document, a study of the effect of globalization on human rights,
was written by two jurists, J. Oloka-Onyango of Uganda and Deepika
Udagama of Sri Lanka.
If approved by the full sub-commission, currently meeting in Geneva, it
will be presented to the annual session of the overall U.N. Human
Rights Commission when it holds its annual six-week session in Geneva
in March and April next year.
The rules of the currently 137-member WTO, the two authors said,
''reflect an agenda that serves only to promote dominant corporatist
interests that already monopolize the area of international trade.''
Human rights, they added, were given only an oblique reference in the
founding documents of the WTO, which was launched at an international
conference in Marrakesh in 1994 to replace the old General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT).
''The net result is that for certain sectors of humanity --
particularly the developing countries of the South -- the WTO is a
veritable nightmare,'' the jurists declared.
There was no comment on the report from the WTO, where senior envoys
from most member states -- some 70 percent of them developing countries
-- and officials of the Secretariat are on summer leave.
Many Poor Countries Queuing To Join Wto
But supporters of the open trading system which it oversees often
refute such arguments by pointing to the weight of developing country
membership and to the fact that at least 30 more poorer economies are
queuing up to join.
They also say the dispute settlement system, which adjudicates in trade
rows on the basis of the rules which all members have agreed to, has
often found in favor of emerging economies in cases they have brought
against big powers. In a discussion on the report, U.N. sub-commission
member El-Hadji Guisse of Senegal, accused the WTO -- of which his
country is a member -- of carrying out a ''second colonialization
process in which the only interest was profit,'' according to a U.N.
summary of his remarks.
If the U.N. were consistent, it would oppose the existence of the trade
body -- which is outside the U.N. system and takes its decisions by
consensus rather than vote -- whose driving motivation was ''money,
domination and exploitation,'' he said.
Another sub-commission member, Yozo Yakota of Japan, said the WTO
should be encouraged to enter into a relationship agreement with the
U.N. so that its activities could be reviewed for compliance with
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.