WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let stand a ruling that a pilots union and two of its officers must pay $45.5 million in compensatory damages to AMR Corp.'s American Airlines, the nation's second-largest airline, for refusing to halt a sickout in 1999.
Without any comment or dissent, the high court rejected an appeal by the Allied Pilots Association, representing American's 10,500 pilots, and its president, Rich LaVoy, and vice president, Brian Mayhew, at the time of the sickout.
The award was assessed because the union ignored a federal judge's order to cease a February 1999 pilot sickout that was ruled illegal.
The 10-day sickout canceled nearly 6,700 flights, snarled American's flight schedule and cost the airline more than $225 million. Pilots launched the labor disruption to protest American's acquisition of smaller Reno Air, whose lower-paid pilots were seen by the union as a threat to job security.
The amount of the award was intended to reflect the cost to American between the judge's issuance of the order to cease the action and the actual end of the sickout.
A U.S. appeals court based in New Orleans upheld the award in September.
The union appealed to the Supreme Court, saying such a civil contempt case involving a complex injunction, disputed factual issues and a serious sanction should be decided in accord with basic due process principles and not through the expedited procedures of a summary nature.
But the justices sided with the airline, declining to review the case. American Airlines told the high court it suffered ''huge financial losses'' because of the sickout.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.