Contact l Sitemap

home industries issues reasearch weblog press

Home  » Industries » Financial Services, Insurance and ...

Ernst & Young Pays $10 Million To Settle Lehman Brothers Audit Failure Lawsuit

by Pratap ChatterjeeCorpWatch Blog
April 16th, 2015

Photo: AK Rockefeller. Used under Creative Commons license.

Ernst & Young, one of the Big Four auditing firms, has agreed to pay a $10 million to New York state to settle a lawsuit for overlooking accounting gimmicks by Lehman Brothers, the defunct Wall Street bank. The scheme allowed Lehman to hide billions of dollars in bad deals.

“If auditors issue opinions that are unreliable or provide cover for their clients by helping to hide material information, that harms the investing public, our economy, and our country,” Eric Schneiderman, attorney-general of New York state, said in a public statement issued after the settlement. “Auditors will be held accountable when they violate the law, just as they are supposed to hold the companies they audit accountable.”

Back in 2001, Lehman Brothers bankers dreamed up a scheme that they named Repo 105 to temporarily “sell” bad debts on condition that they would repurchase them a week to ten days later. The term Repo is derived from “repossess” and 105 referred to the five percent premium it paid for the service, as opposed to the usual two percent. With the worst deals taken off their balance sheet, the bank appeared more financially healthy than it actually was.

Buyers of Repo 105 included Barclays of the UK, KBC Bank of Belgium, Mizuho Bank and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group of Japan, and UBS of Switzerland. But Lehman Brothers ran into problems with this novel technique since no U.S. law firm would sign off on this scheme as a “true sale.” In order to get approval, the bank turned to Linklaters, one of the top five UK law firms to do so instead.

Linklaters partner Simon Firth agreed with one caveat. “This opinion is limited to English law as applied by the English courts and is given on the basis that it will be governed by and construed in accordance with English law,” he wrote.

An investigation into Lehman by Anton Valukas, a court-appointed bankruptcy examiner and former federal prosecutor, cited a July 2008 e-mail exchange from two Lehman staff.

Vallecillo: “So what’s up with repo 105? Why are we doing less next quarter end?

McGarvey: “It’s basically window‐dressing. We are calling repos true sales based on legal technicalities. The exec committee wanted the number cut in half.”

Vallecillo: “I see . . . so it’s legally do‐able but doesn’t look good when we actually do it? Does the rest of the street do it?

McGarvey: “Yes, No.”

At the time, Ernst & Young, which was also headquartered in the UK, was on contract to audit the bank’s books. Between 2001 and 2008, the firm was paid $150 million by Lehman Brothers to certify that the bank’s financial statement represented a true and accurate picture.

In September 2008, the bank collapsed, triggering a global economic crisis. In 2010, the New York state attorney general sued Ernst & Whinney for failing to report the scheme. The state asked the firm to return the $150 million that it had earned from Lehman Brothers.

In October 2013, Ernst & Young agreed to pay $99 million to settle a lawsuit by Lehman Brothers investors. This week, the firm agreed to pay out another $10 million to New York state.

The firm continues to deny any wrong doing. "Lehman's audited financial statements clearly portrayed Lehman as what it was - a highly leveraged entity operating in a risky and volatile industry; and Lehman's bankruptcy was not caused by any accounting issues," Ernst & Young said in a statement. “After many years of costly litigation we are pleased to put this matter behind us, with no findings of wrongdoing by EY or any of its professionals.”