Contact l Sitemap

home industries issues reasearch weblog press

Home  » Issues » Money & Politics

US: Hedge Funds Boost Profile in Lobbying

by Susan Pulliam and Tom McGintyWall Street Journal
June 22nd, 2009

Many hedge funds were relieved last week when the Obama administration's financial-overhaul plan included no big surprises or threats to the lucrative, secretive industry.

It isn't clear exactly why hedge funds escaped their worst fears. But one factor might have helped: The hedge-fund industry has been spending a lot more time and money in Washington during the past few years.

[Hedge Funds Lobbying Expenditures]

In 2008, major hedge funds and their trade groups spent $6.1 million lobbying Washington, up from $4.2 million in 2007 and nearly seven times the $897,000 average from 2003 to 2006. The growth rate in hedge-fund lobbying far exceeds the 38% increase for the overall financial-services industry between 2006 and 2008, according to figures compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, a research group that tracks political spending.

The lobbying push marks a shift for the $1 trillion hedge-fund industry. In the past, hedge funds usually stayed off the radar screen, often reacting after congressional or regulatory proposals were made. Now they are playing offense, meeting with lawmakers and regulators in hopes of convincing them that hedge funds are important cogs in the financial markets and weren't responsible for the continuing financial crisis.

Hedge funds have "learned from their mistakes," says Daniel Clifton, an analyst with research firm Strategas Research Partners LLC. "They want to get their message out," hoping to temper the view in Congress that they are "greedy."

The hedge-fund industry is making no secret of its higher profile. Heavy political hitters now working for the industry include Richard Baker, the former Republican representative from Louisiana hired last year as president and chief executive of the Managed Funds Association, the main hedge-fund trade group. MFA recently recruited a former staff member of Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) to help advance its agenda on details of how regulation would work.

"You name a senior member of the [House] financial-services committee or the [Senate] banking committee, and I or a member of my staff have been in that office within the past six months," Mr. Baker says.

The new approach was evident as the Obama administration pieced together its financial-regulation proposal. In meetings with representatives of the Federal Reserve, hedge-fund representatives said they would be less likely to participate in government programs to buy bank assets if they were subjected to extensive disclosure requirements as part of the regulatory changes, a person familiar with the discussions says.

The meetings were part of a broader effort by the Fed to gain feedback from investors on a variety of issues, according to a person close to the situation.

Hedge funds faced intense scrutiny from lawmakers and regulators last fall amid short-selling and swaps activity that helped drive down already battered financial stocks. Hedge-fund paychecks surpassing $1 billion last year became a lightning rod for criticism. There was more bad blood when some hedge funds that were creditors of Chrysler Corp. showed reluctance to go along with the government's restructuring plan for the auto maker.

The White House's overhaul includes subjecting all hedge funds to registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first time. Many hedge funds already are registered, following earlier efforts by the SEC and lawmakers.

Tougher rules feared by hedge funds aren't in the proposal, such as requiring documentation of all trades or provisions that would force hedge funds to lower fees charged to investors. Such fees often have included a 2% management fee and a 20% cut of the fund's profits.

President Barack Obama is pushing for the Federal Reserve to have oversight of hedge funds if they are deemed to pose a systemic risk to the financial system. That would put some of the largest hedge funds on the same regulatory level as giant banks such as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc.

The MFA called the Obama plan "intelligent" and said it supports the principles of the president's proposals.

In the first quarter, the trade group spent $750,000 on lobbying, up 14% from a year earlier, according to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal of U.S. Senate records documenting lobbying of federal agencies and both houses of Congress. The hedge-fund industry's overall spending was about $1.6 million, down 4% from 2008's first quarter.

One of the biggest hedge-fund lobbyists is Citadel Investment Group, which spent a total of $1.9 million from 2007 through the first quarter of this year, records show. The Coalition of Private Investment Companies, a group led Jim Chanos, founder of hedge fund Kynikos Associates, spent $1.1 million on lobbying in the same period.

Mr. Chanos testified before Congress this year on regulatory reforms in the financial sector and attended President Obama's announcement of regulatory changes on Wednesday.

In an email, Mr. Chanos confirms the spending figure and his attendance at last week's announcement but didn't comment further. The White House declined to comment.

As President Obama's proposals are translated into legislation in coming weeks, the hedge-fund industry's lobbying muscle will likely face its biggest test yet. Hedge funds are bracing for additional disclosure requirements from Congress. Some hedge-fund representatives have begun meeting with members of Congress and their staff members, hoping to convince them that stricter disclosure requirements would be too costly.

Sen. Jack Reed (D., R.I.), who recently introduced a hedge-fund bill similar to the Obama plan, said the White House's approach provides a "good foundation."[hedge funds]





This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.