Federal prosecutors are investigating an alleged
criminal price-fixing conspiracy in the $1.8 billion market for
packaged ice, with the help of a former industry executive who told
authorities the collusion was nationwide and forced up prices for
consumers and businesses.
In a July 23 filing in federal court in Detroit, and
in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, a former vice president
of sales for Party Time Ice, Martin McNulty, disclosed new details of
the ice probe and said some industry executives were caught by FBI
wiretaps discussing the alleged conspiracy.
Mr. McNulty's identity and his central role in the
criminal investigation haven't been previously reported. Federal
law-enforcement officials confirmed that information provided by Mr.
McNulty triggered the investigation, which began in Detroit three years
In June, prosecutors unsealed charges against Home City Ice
Co., Cincinnati, alleging that the company conspired to suppress
competition in the Detroit market from 2001 to 2007. The company, which
pleaded guilty to the charges, makes 4,400 tons of ice a day and is the
market leader in the Midwest. It could face fines of as much as $100
In March, Reddy Ice Holdings Inc., of Dallas, said its
offices were searched by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and
Arctic Glacier Inc., Winnipeg, Manitoba, said it had been served with a
subpoena. Neither company has been charged with any wrongdoing.
companies dominate the national market for wholesale ice and the bagged
ice sold at supermarkets, gas stations and convenience stores. Federal
antitrust enforcers are looking into allegations that they secretly
agreed to allocate customers and regional markets among themselves,
keeping ice prices high and excluding rivals.
Reddy and Arctic have each issued statements saying
they are cooperating with the government's investigation. The chief
financial officers of both companies declined to comment further on the
probe or on Mr. McNulty's claims. Home City is cooperating with
investigators under terms of its plea agreement.
Reddy said its board formed an independent committee
to conduct an internal investigation. Reddy says it is the nation's
largest maker of packaged ice, with 2,000 employees in 31 states. Its
marketing jingle: "Good times are in the Bag!"
Arctic Glacier, the operating unit of Arctic Glacier
Income Fund, also based in Winnipeg, said it operates 37 plants in the
U.S. and Canada. It has been an aggressive acquirer of its local
competitors, buying 77 ice makers from Portland, Ore., to Brooklyn,
N.Y., since 1996.
In addition to the possibility of criminal prosecution
in the price-fixing probe, the three ice companies face dozens of civil
suits filed by customers around the country who claim they were
One of the latest and most detailed of these lawsuits
was filed in federal court in Detroit July 11 by Boies Schiller &
Flexner LLP, on behalf of McGeary's Pub in Albany, N.Y., and Bill's
Beverage Center in Amsterdam, N.Y. Their attorney, Richard Drubel, said
the suit seeks to recover alleged overcharges by the three major ice
makers, on behalf of all of their retail customers.
Depending on the part of the country, the retail price of a seven-pound bag of ice typically ranges from around $1.50 to $2.00.
Mr. McNulty, 45 years old, told investigators he was
fired by Arctic Glacier in 2005, after the company acquired Party Time
Ice, of Port Huron, Mich., because he refused to participate in the
price-fixing conspiracy. In May 2005, he approached the Justice
Department's antitrust unit in Detroit. He soon became an active
participant in the investigation, working with the FBI to tape
telephone calls and, at one point, wearing a wire to a dinner with an
industry executive at a T.G.I. Friday's restaurant in Lansing, Mich.
In a lawsuit filed two weeks ago in Detroit, Mr.
McNulty is seeking back pay and other damages from Arctic Glacier and
the other alleged conspirators. He says that in his position as a top
salesman in the industry, industry executives discussed the conspiracy
with him; he also said he was sometimes asked not to approach certain
customers because they were on another company's turf.
Mr. McNulty said that he provided prosecutors with
evidence of a secret agreement by the companies to divide up big
customers and stay out of each others' sales regions. Such
market-allocation agreements, if proved in court, are criminal and
often bring stiff fines and imprisonment.
Federal law-enforcement officials have confirmed Mr.
McNulty played an active role in the investigation but wouldn't discuss
details. Court filing show that investigators have gathered other
evidence expanding on Mr. McNulty's initial allegations.
In an interview, Mr. McNulty said he lost his home
after he was fired, and that he was later offered his job back, at
twice his original salary, if he would agree to go along with the
conspiracy. "The arrogance was breathtaking," he said. "They considered
their own customers to be the enemy. They said to me, 'We can't let
them play one of us off the other, all they want is to get a better
Mr. McNulty's attorney, Daniel Low, of Kotchen &
Low in Washington, said some of the evidence that he was fired for
refusing to cooperate, and was then blackballed in the industry, is
supported by wiretaps and other information the government has obtained
in its investigation of the ice makers.
A Justice Department spokeswoman, Gina Talamona,
declined to comment, citing the continuing probe, which she called
Write to John R. Wilke at firstname.lastname@example.org
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.