European regulators have filed fresh charges against the world's
biggest computer chip maker Intel over alleged abuse of its dominant
The European Commission (EC) accused the firm of paying a leading
European retailer not to stock products containing chips made by rival
It is also accused of giving incentives to PC makers to switch to Intel chips.
Intel, which has eight weeks to respond to the allegations, said it was disappointed with the EC's claims.
The Commission has also accused Intel of paying the PC maker to delay the planned launch of a product containing AMD chips.
The EC said Intel "used its considerable muscle to provide
substantial rebates to a leading European PC retailer - conditional on
it selling only Intel-based PCs".
Intel said in a statement it was disappointed with the Commission's claims.
"The issuance of a second Statement of Objections suggests that
the Commission supports AMD's position that Intel should be prevented
from competing fairly and offering price discounts which have resulted
in lower prices for consumers."
Intel added that "the allegations stem from the same set of complaints
that our competitor, AMD, has been making to regulators and courts
around the world for more than 10 years".
The company has eight weeks to respond to the Commission's three new charges and can seek a hearing in Brussels.
It is not the first row between the US technology firm and regulators in Brussels.
In February, EU officials raided Intel's German office amid claims it abused its market position.
Last summer, the Commission unveiled the initial results of a
probe that claimed Intel engaged in anti-competitive action to thwart
Brussels accused the world's largest chipmaker of giving rebates to
customers provided they bought Intel products and offered incentives to
companies to delay or cancel products containing AMD technology.
European regulators have the power to fine Intel up to 10% of annual turnover if they find it guilty of stifling competition.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.