The OFT names 11 retailers, including Asda, Sainsbury and Tesco, and tobacco firms Imperial Tobacco and Gallaher.
One allegation is that retailers and tobacco groups arranged to swap information on future pricing.
A separate allegation is that there was an understanding that the price of some brands would be linked to rival brands.
Imperial Tobacco owns brands such as Embassy, John Player Special and
Lambert & Butler while Gallaher's best-selling products include
Benson & Hedges and Silk Cut.
The OFT said understandings between cigarette companies and retailers
between 2000 and 2003 limited the retailers' ability "to determine its
selling price independently".
In the case of Gallaher, Imperial Tobacco, Asda, Sainsbury, Shell,
Somerfield and Tesco, there was an indirect exchange of proposed future
retail prices between competitors, it adds, allegedly between 2001 and
"This is not about price fixing," an OFT spokeswoman said.
"This is about retail price co-ordination, which is also illegal.
"We have information that manufacturers and retailers were indirectly exchanging information about future prices."
Michael Pullen, a competition lawyer at the firm DLA Piper,
told BBC News that, to the layman, what was being alleged was the same
as price fixing.
"In order to fix prices you would need an express agreement between two
manufacturers, and the OFT have not found any evidence of any agreement
which is why they can't allege price fixing but they are alleging price
coordination and there is a subtle legal distinction," he said, adding,
that to a layman, "in practice the effect is the same".
In a statement, Imperial Tobacco said it "takes compliance with
competition law very seriously and rejects any suggestion that it has
acted in any way contrary to the interests of consumers".
In a public response, Tesco said that "the OFT's investigation appears
to centre on major tobacco companies. We do not believe that Tesco has
acted in a way that has harmed consumers and we will make this clear to
the OFT when we see the details of their allegations".
The OFT has been building up its case in secret for five years and
refuses to say whether it has been helped by a whistleblower, the BBC's
business editor Robert Peston said.
Sonia Branch of the OFT explains the allegations
Even now, the OFT says there should be no assumption that any of the named companies have broken the law.
But if they are found to have done so, they could be fined up to 10% of annual turnover - or tens of millions of pounds.
"For markets to work well for consumers, it is a fundamental
principle that pricing decisions should be made independently," said
OFT chief executive John Fingleton.
"If we find evidence of anti-competitive activity, we are prepared to
use the appropriate powers to punish the companies involved and to
deter other businesses from taking part in such behaviour," he added.
"If proven, the alleged practices would amount to a serious breach of the law."
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.