Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 26, 2008; A04
privately convened commission of labor and immigrant advocates held the
first of several planned nationwide hearings yesterday to publicize
allegations that U.S. immigration officials routinely violate
constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure
during workplace raids.
At the gathering at the Hay-Adams hotel in the District, witnesses and members of the 10-person panel accused Immigration and Customs Enforcement
officials of using arrest warrants for a limited number of illegal
immigrants who work at a given company as a pretext to detain the
entire workforce, including many U.S. citizens, while agents determine
whether there are additional illegal immigrants among them.
of millions of workers in America go to work every day without . . . an
awareness that at their workplaces, without any warning, they could be
swept up in a massive raid conducted by heavily armed government
agents," said Joe Hansen, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
and chairman of the National Commission on ICE Misconduct and
Violations of 4th Amendment Rights. "Workers are not aware that they
could be detained at gunpoint. That they could be handcuffed. . . .
That they could be denied any contact with family members or legal
The commission heard testimony from two workers who are
U.S. citizens who said they were detained for several hours during an
ICE raid of six Swift meatpacking plants in December 2006. The union
has filed a class action on their behalf.
Afterward, Pat Reilly,
an ICE spokeswoman who attended the hearing as an observer, said the
agency's procedures for questioning workers during raids at businesses
are fair and humane and have been routinely upheld by courts.
would imagine that some people may be detained beyond what they feel is
reasonable. But it's subjective," she said. "What we're trying to do is
get to the bottom of who has the right to be here and who might be
posing as a U.S. citizen."
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.