The parents of Rachel Corrie, the US peace activist who was
crushed to death four years ago in the then Israeli-occupied Gaza as
she was protesting against the demolition of Palestinian homes, have
been refused permission to sue the company which made the bulldozer
that killed her.
On Monday a federal appeals court ruled that Caterpillar Inc, the
Illinois-based company that has supplied several bulldozers used by
the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) in house demolitions in the occupied
territories, could not be sued as to do so would bring the judiciary
into conflict with the executive branch of the US government.
A panel of three judges argued that the legal action could not have
gone to trial "without implicitly questioning, and even condemning,
United States foreign policy towards Israel".
Corrie was killed on March 16 2003 by a 60-tonne Caterpillar D9
bulldozer in Rafah, Gaza, as she was attempting to prevent the home of
a Palestinian pharmacist being razed. She was wearing a fluorescent
orange vest and according to witnesses in full view of the bulldozer
Her parents, along with four Palestinian families left bereaved in
actions involving similar bulldozers, began legal proceedings in 2005.
Lawyers acting for the families alleged that Caterpillar had sold the
machines to the Israeli government on a commercial basis. The firm
knew, or should have known, that the equipment was going to be used to
demolish homes in violation of international law in incidents that at
times led to the deaths of innocent people, they said.
Caterpillar, with supporting evidence from the US government, argued
that the machines had been paid for by the Pentagon as part of the
government's military aid to Israel.
Cindy Corrie, Rachel's mother, told the Guardian that she was
extremely disappointed by the court's decision. "Clearly there
were war crimes committed here and we will continue to challenge
Caterpillar and the US government."
Mariah LaHood, a lawyer with the Centre for Constitutional Rights who
acted on the case, questioned the role the US government played in
giving evidence favourable to Caterpillar. "Isn't there a
responsibility to permit justice to be sought on behalf of a US
citizen killed in a foreign country?"
Caterpillar said in a statement that it was pleased with the ruling.
"We are hopeful it will bring to an end what has been a lengthy but
fair judicial process."
Corrie's story received widespread attention at the time of her
death. Her emails home describing her experiences as a peace activist
in the run-up to her death were turned into a stage play, My Name is
Rachel Corrie, coedited by Alan Rickman and the Guardian journalist
Among the other families included in the legal suit were that of
Mahmoud Omar al-Shu'bi from Nablus in the West Bank. In April 2002 a
D9 bulldozer destroyed his home in the middle of the night in an
action by the IDF, allegedly without warning. His father Umar, sisters
Fatima and Abir, brother Samir and sister-in-law Nabila who was
pregnant, as well as their three children aged four , seven and nine,
were all killed.
The sale of Caterpillar equipment to Israel caused controversy within
the Church of England after the synod voted last year to disinvest
from firms profiting from Israel's occupation of Palestinian
territory. However, it later decided to keep its shares in the
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.