The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled against Wackenhut in a case involving security workers who sought to organize a union at the headquarters of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington, DC. Wackenhut, the U.S. government's largest supplier of private guards, is the U.S. subsidiary of London-based global security conglomerate Group 4 Securicor.
The NLRB upheld an administrative law judge's finding that Wackenhut illegally intimidated and interrogated security officers Anderson Carter and Terry Purnell, who were leading an effort to encourage their co-workers to become members of Service Employees International Union (SEIU). In the organizing drive a solid majority of Wackenhut officers signed cards expressing their desire to join SEIU, the nation's largest security union. Wackenhut fired both Carter and Purnell after a majority of workers at the site signed union cards indicating their support for unionizing.
"I never doubted standing up was the right thing to do," said Terry Purnell, a veteran security officer who had been at his IMF post for only 12 months. "I think Wackenhut's claims that it respects the right of workers to organize unions in the U.S. are ridiculous and now this decision proves that."
According to the NLRB ruling, Wackenhut violated workers rights by:
* Telling employees that the International Monetary Fund contract prohibited unions
* Threatening employees with the loss of their jobs if they unionized
* Creating the impression of surveillance of employees' union activities
* Telling employees they should transfer to another worksite if they want to continue their union activity
* Interrogating employees about their union activities
Wackenhut's actions caused a public uproar, particularly given the profile of the IMF. U.S. Congressman George Miller, who now chairs the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Education and Labor, intervened and encouraged the IMF to act.
Wackenhut soon lost the contract to provide security services at the organization. The contract was worth an estimated $4.4 million annually.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.