Contact l Sitemap

home industries issues reasearch weblog press

Home  » Industries » War & Disaster Profiteering

IRAQ: Contractor's Work in Iraq Is Under Scrutiny

by Griffe WitteThe Washington Post
September 28th, 2006

The contractor that botched construction of a $75 million police academy in Baghdad so badly that it was deemed a health risk has produced shoddy work on 13 out of 14 projects reviewed by federal auditors, the top official monitoring Iraq's reconstruction told Congress today.

The projects managed by California-based Parsons Corp. are at the heart of the $21 billion U.S.-led Iraq reconstruction program, including fire stations, border forts and health care facilities. The one project for which construction work met standards -- a prison -- was cancelled by the government before it was completed because of escalating costs.

 In a report released today, inspectors revealed that the Baghdad Police College posed a health risk to recruits because feces and urine were leaking through the ceilings of student barracks. The academy was intended as a showcase for U.S. efforts to train Iraqis who eventually are expected to take control of the nation's security from the U.S. military.

Parsons senior vice president Earnest O. Robbins II told a House panel investigating the failures that poor work by Iraqi subcontractors and a deteriorating security situation were to blame. But Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Stuart W. Bowen Jr. said that it appeared the company had fallen down in its responsibility to manage the work.

"It boils down to a lack of oversight," Bowen said.

The company came under fire from congressmen on both sides of the aisle. "Don't you think that Parsons, given what turned out to be a very shoddy job, should return some of its profits to the taxpayer?" asked Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD).

"No sir, I do not," Robbins replied, explaining that it is up to the Army Corps of Engineers, which managed the contract, to determine how much profit the company makes.





This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.