Two groups of investors are suing Diebold Inc., claiming that misleading comments about the company's electronic voting machine business artificially inflated share prices.
The lawsuits filed this week in U.S. District Court in Cleveland claim Diebold was "unable to assure the quality and working order of its voting machine products," which are being scrutinized by election officials in several states.
The plaintiffs claim that the company tried to conceal the problems from investors and that Diebold lacked the internal controls necessary to accurately monitor its financial performance.
Both lawsuits seek class-action status.
The North Canton, Ohio-based company denied the allegations Friday, saying in a statement that "the lawsuits are without merit."
Colchester, Conn., firm Scott & Scott LLC sued on behalf of investors who held Diebold stock between Oct. 22, 2003, and Sept. 21, 2005. Stull, Stull & Brady of New York also sued, representing people whose employers bought Diebold stock for their retirement accounts during that same period.
The lawsuits claim the company's actions led to poor earnings guidance. Restructuring charges revealed on Sept. 21 caused share prices to plummet 16 percent that day.
Diebold said then that rising fuel costs, poor automated-teller machine sales and unexpected delays of voting machine sales because of Hurricane Katrina forced it to slash third-quarter earnings by more than half.
These suits come just days after CEO Walden W. O'Dell quit. Besides concerns about security and reliability of Diebold's election equipment, O'Dell was criticized in 2003 when he invited people to a Bush fundraiser.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.