Contact l Sitemap

home industries issues reasearch weblog press

Home  » Industries » War & Disaster Profiteering

US: Federal Judge Sends Blackwater Suit to State Court

A lawsuit accusing North Carolina-based Blackwater Security Consulting of wrongful death and fraud in the deaths of four guards killed and mutilated in Iraq should be heard in a North Carolina courts, a federal judge has ruled.

by Emery P. DalesioAssociated Press
August 15th, 2005

A lawsuit accusing a North Carolina-based security contractor of wrongful death and fraud in the deaths of four guards killed and mutilated in Iraq should be heard in a North Carolina courts, a federal judge has ruled.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs considered the ruling a victory for survivors of the four slain Blackwater Security Consulting contractors. North Carolina allows financial compensation in wrongful death lawsuits.

The brutal slayings of Stephen S. Helvenston, Mike R. Teague, Jerko Gerald Zovko and Wesley J.K. Batalona on March 31, 2004, made worldwide headlines. Frenzied crowds dragged their charred bodies through the streets of Fallujah and strung two of them up from a bridge.

Teague, 38, of Clarksville, Tenn., was a 12-year Army veteran and had joined Blackwater about two months before the attack.

The guards' families sued the company in state court in January, alleging Blackwater cut corners that led to the men's deaths. The workers were sent into Fallujah without proper equipment and personnel to defend the supply convoy they were guarding, the lawsuit said.

The company, based in Moyock, quickly moved to have the case heard in federal court, and then dismissed.

Blackwater argued the federal courts had jurisdiction in the case because of the Defense Base Act, a federal law limiting death benefits for contractors working overseas.

Company lawyers also argued that there was a "unique federal interest" in deciding the remedies available to contractors in war zones.

In a ruling issued Thursday, U.S. District Judge Louise Flanagan declined to move the lawsuit to federal court, but agreed that the case raised "novel and complex" issues.

A spokesman for Blackwater did not return calls seeking comment Monday.

A California-based attorney representing the estates of the four men said the federal law didn't apply because the men were independent contractors, not Blackwater employees. The Defense Base Act also applies to negligent contact, while Blackwater's actions were intentional, said attorney Marc Miles in Santa Ana, Calif.

Blackwater "knew they were cutting corners and they sent these gentlemen out without the needed tools, protection and information. This was not an accident," Miles said.

The plaintiffs will be entitled to compensatory and punitive damages if they win their case in state court, Miles said.

The ruling and the case could set important precedents in U.S. courts. Miles said his firm believes the lawsuit was the first involving private U.S. contractors in Iraq, though others have since been filed.

Blackwater contracted with ESS Support Services Worldwide to guard food shipments to U.S. bases in Iraq. According to the lawsuit, the contract called for security teams to have two armored vehicles and a minimum of six people, as well as a heavy machine gun that could fire up to 850 rounds a minute.

The four men who died were sent out in unarmored vehicles, without the heavy machine gun and without a map and got lost, the lawsuit said. Having lacked time to become familiar with their weapons or routes around Fallujah, they went directly through the violent city.

The lawsuit claims Blackwater's failure to live up to the terms of the contract amounted to fraud.

No specific damages are listed in the suit, as is routine in North Carolina civil suits.

The men's estates are named as plaintiffs in the case; their survivors live in Oceanside, Calif.; Leesburg, Fla.; Statesboro, Ga.; Paauilo, Hawaii; Clarksville; and Willoughby, Ohio.

 

 

 





This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.