SULAYMANIYAH, Iraq — Insurgent violence is doing more than taking lives and disrupting the political process in Iraq.
With nearly half of the allotted funds for reconstruction projects going toward security, the violence is cutting into the country’s rebuilding process.
Of the $18 billion budgeted for the Iraq Reconstruction Program, $7 billion is spent on securing the workers and the construction sites that are contracted and overseen by the Corps of Engineers Gulf Region District and the Project and Contracting Office.
“Our biggest concern is security,” Brig. Gen. William H. McCoy Jr., commander of Corps of Engineers Gulf Region District, said in an interview with Stars and Stripes on July 30 in Baghdad. “In the last week or two, we had about 20 incidents [of violence] a week. This past week, there were 33. They range from letters saying ‘Don’t come here or we’ll kill you’ to the opposite extreme, killing contractors.
“It has an effect. We try to go out and encourage the contractors who have left the sites to come back.”
Security costs are part of the budget for many of the sites throughout Iraq.
How much to spend on security and to whom it is contracted is up to the project contractor at the site, said Frank Scopa, Mosul area engineer for the Corps of Engineers Gulf Region North.
In Mosul, the best security step is for American engineers to stay away from the sites.
“The security situation here doesn’t allow the engineers to visit the sites on a regular basis,” Scopa said.
Instead, contractors are required to send regular reports and photos of the progress at the sites, he said.
There also are sites that engineers can’t visit in the Kirkuk region, but in the outlying areas — such as Sulaymaniyah and at most of the border forts — engineers are able to make regular visits with a contracted personal security team from the company Erinys.
“We have sites that we don’t visit regularly, because it would be a risk to the workers if we showed up regularly,” said Donna Street, Kirkuk area engineer, Corps of Engineers Gulf Region North.
The team sped through the streets of Kirkuk outside the forward operating base at the start of a site visit on Aug. 2, moving around cars and frequently changing lanes as if to present a moving target. The tension among the security team was palpable.
“I have every confidence in these guys,” Street said of her personal security team. “I trust them with my life. I wouldn’t trade them for anybody. I let them worry about the security aspect. It’s not that I’m not aware of what’s going on, but that is what they are there for.”
At a fort in Khormal on the Iranian border later that same day, on-site contractor Shapoor Amin said security in the area was not much of a problem. The only security element present was about five border guards.
In the Dohuk and Irbil resident offices, security is provided by a team of peshmerga, or Kurdish soldiers. The peshmerga are credited with the relative safety and stability in the region east of Mosul, known unofficially as Kurdistan.
While the peshmerga soldiers carry AK-47s, the most extreme action taken by local residents toward the Irbil resident office vehicles during site visits usually is energetic waving and smiling.
“It’s a different environment here,” said Gary York, construction representative for the Irbil Resident Office. “The people here are busy with their own rebuilding, and they let us get to work on our projects.”
Although there is a lot of progress in other regions as well, attacks on U.S.-led construction sites heavily factor into the level of success the engineers can attain — much to the frustration of Street.
“Without a secure environment, they can’t reconstruct,” she said. “Without reconstruction, they can’t have a secure environment.”
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.