|COLOMBIA: Fighting Energy Companies Over River Pollution|
May 26th, 2005
Every Tuesday before 6 p.m., Father Wigberto
Suarez prepares for evening Mass in the Colombian town of Sibate. Among
his rituals are gathering bug spray, a hand-held pump and a bottle of
"If someone wants to come here to pray, (he) can't, because the
mosquitoes bother him," he said, as he sprayed bug spray around a bank
of white kneelers and pews inside the church. For his own nighttime
prayer, Father Suarez hangs white mosquito netting around a small space
near the altar.
Over the past few years, a mosquito plague in Sibate has disrupted not
just church services, but life in general for the town's 32,000
residents. Millions of mosquitoes that breed in the Muna reservoir on
Sibate's outskirts have made life so difficult that residents cannot
study, read, watch TV or sleep peacefully at night.
Muna, once a pristine reservoir that attracted tourists for water
sports and recreation, is now a source not only of mosquitoes, but also
of foul odors, rats and gastrointestinal, respiratory, dermatological
and other disorders, residents said.
The problems stemmed from a decision decades ago that allowed the
Empresa de Energia de Bogota, a city-owned electricity company, to
reroute the Bogota River away from its natural course and into Muna to
supply water for two hydroelectric generating plants.
Now, the Bogota River is a stew of industrial waste, heavy metals and
raw sewage due to industrial dumping and a dearth of waste treatment
plants in Bogota and other towns that use the river to dispose of their
sewage. As a result, Muna has become what Sibate councilman Alfonso
Gonzalez calls "the world's largest open sewer."
"This is a clear example of environmental injustice, where the
violation of human rights, of health rights, of the right to a healthy
environment and the right to a decent life affects local residents
daily," said Paula Alvarez of the environmental organization Censat
Agua Viva, the Colombian branch of Friends of the Earth.
The power plants are now operated under a 1997 concession by the
multinational corporation Emgesa, which is controlled by Spanish
electricity giant Endesa and majority-owned by Empresa de Energia de
For years, a handful of town activists have fought to rid their town of the river pollution.
But in Sibate "economic rights are guaranteed over social and human rights," said Mayor Ana Leonor Gantivar.
Over the past several years local residents have sued for damages,
promoted congressional hearings and appealed to environmental
authorities. Last year, some 10,000 local residents gathered in the
town square for a peaceful protest.
Father Suarez, who recently received a visit by Emgesa officials to
explain their perspective on the controversy, has rallied local
residents to support community leaders and participate in the protests.
Part of his efforts are aimed at "encouraging people to join the campaign, because people are very passive," he said.
Father Suarez views his support for town leaders as a way of spreading
the Gospel and emulating Christ. "Jesus was neither oblivious nor
indifferent to the problems of his time," he said. "We, too, must raise
public awareness through holy Mass, in sermons, from the pulpit."
Local residents have reacted favorably to Father Suarez's stance on the
issue, he said. "It is a way to reinforce people in their faith. Faith
in God grows ... knowing that he is a God that worries about all of our
needs and all of our problems," the priest said.
However, the town's demands have prompted Empresa and Emgesa to spend
$8.5 million over eight years to help solve the problems. They have
soaked the town in insecticides, dried up sections of the reservoir
that once embraced the town's outer limits, and built a barrier to keep
reservoir waters at a distance. Nevertheless, "the quality of life for
local residents has not improved in the least," said Orlando Guaqueta,
who has lived most of his 43 years in Sibate.
Sibate is now pressing for a more drastic solution: an order prohibiting Emgesa from pumping the Bogota River through Muna.
The Autonomous Regional Corp., a regional environmental agency,
threatened just that in a March 28 resolution. But first, the
corporation gave the companies 18 months to implement specific
environmental measures to reduce the mosquito population. The
corporation will only stop the companies from pumping the river through
Muna if the measures fall short of the targets.
Closing off Muna from the Bogota River would also stop Emgesa from
generating electricity at the plants fed by Muna. "Closing Muna is the
worst solution (the regional corporation) could take," said Lucio
Rubio, Emgesa general manager, in April.
Emgesa said the move would increase the risk of power cuts, drive up
electricity rates, pollute additional communities, and contribute to
global warming as gas generators replace hydro plants.
At the same time, Emgesa said it is not responsible for Muna's
river-derived pollution. "Thirty years of environmental
irresponsibility regarding the Bogota River cannot result in any
penalty at all for Emgesa," the company said.
Local residents disagree. The companies "are the ones polluting Sibate,
because they are the ones that pump the water and bring it here,"
The administration of President Alvaro Uribe Velez, meanwhile, has
drafted a $2.5 billion, 15-year plan to clean up the Muna reservoir and
the Bogota River.
But just as local residents doubt that the Autonomous Regional Corp.
resolution will bring either lasting solutions or the closure of Muna,
they also are unwilling to wait 15 years to have their environment
"What can change in 18 months, if it hasn't changed in 10 or 20 years?"
said Gonzalez. "If Sibate doesn't find a solution to this problem soon,
we're going to use more drastic measures."
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.