Ecuador and four other Latin
American banana producers sought World Trade Organisation arbitration on
Wednesday in their dispute with the European Union, raising the prospect of
another long trade battle over the EU's banana import regime.
WTO banana arbitration could also have a wider impact on world trade
negotiations. Brussels recently accused the Latin Americans of deliberately
delaying the arbitration request, with the aim of dragging out the whole
procedure until a key WTO ministerial meeting in Hong Kong in December.
Trade diplomats fear a repeat in Hong Kong of events in Doha in November
2001, when Latin American producers threatened to block an interim global trade
deal until their demands were met on bananas.
A last-minute deal providing for arbitration on the introduction of a new EU
tariff-only banana import regime was eventually reached, satisfying Latin
American banana producers unhappy with the EU's transitional arrangements.
The EU, which is due to introduce a new banana import regime from 2006, has
been caught between the competing wishes of Latin American nations and banana
producers among the African and Caribbean (ACP) countries essentially former
European colonies that benefit from a preferential tariff treatment from the
Latin American producers have been angered by an EU proposal for a common
tariff of €230 ($298, £158) per tonne, arguing that the EU should switch instead
to a zero-tariff policy, or at worst maintain a regime equivalent to the current
tariff level of €75.
ACP countries want a higher tariff of €275. The arbitration will also take
the WTO into unchartered legal waters. Special rules will have to be devised,
for instance, to allow the US and ACP countries to participate.
Under the Doha accord, the arbitrator must be appointed within 30 days of the
arbitration request and will then have 90 days to decide whether the new EU
tariff can guarantee “total market access” to Latin American banana
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.