The army will put the work
out to contract, the newspaper says, quoting an army memorandum which estimates the contract to be worth $13bn (£7.3bn).
Halliburton has been accused of overcharging since it was handed the no-bid contract last year.US Vice-President Dick Cheney headed the firm until he took office in 2001. He has, however, denied that this has led to preferential treatment for the firm. The US army had no immediate comment to make to BBC News Online on the Wall Street Journal report.
US defence officials say the intention to break the contract with
Halliburton was not intended to penalise its Kellogg Brown & Root
(KBR) unit which handles the Iraq operation, the newspaper says.
KBR provides troops in Kuwait and Iraq with housing, dining halls, transportation and laundry services. Rather, the intention was to find greater efficiency by parcelling the work out to a greater number of firms.
Halliburton spokeswoman Wendy Hall told the newspaper that the move was
expected but that KBR would consider bidding for parts of the work. In the memo dated 25 August, the newspaper says, the
army's chief of procurement policy, Tina Balard, directed top officials
to "immediately begin the transition to competitively awarded
sustainment contracts for support of US military forces in The memo also addresses the army's increasing
frustration with efforts to devise a final estimated cost of the work, the Journal continues.
One option considered was for the army to come up with its own estimation of costs.
The newspaper pointed out that such a move could make it more difficult
for KBR to stay within estimated costs which would make it harder for
it to qualify for its 2% bonus. Ms Hall told the newspaper that this could have
financial implications for the firm as "the award fee is where you make
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.