Contact l Sitemap

home industries issues reasearch weblog press

Home  » Industries » War & Disaster Profiteering

Iraq: Army Contract Again Disputed


It is awarded to a consortium comprising some of the firms in a group whose winning bid was canceled amid controversy.

by T. Christian MillerLos Angeles Times
May 26th, 2004

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Army has, for the second time, awarded
a contract to supply the Iraqi security forces to a consortium of
companies with little arms experience and whose participants
include a friend of controversial Iraqi official Ahmad Chalabi.

ANHAM, a joint venture based in Vienna, Va., was the winner of a
$259-million contract to equip the new Iraqi army and security forces with
guns, trucks and other equipment, it was announced late Tuesday.
The consortium includes many of the same companies as a group 
headed by Nour USA, whose contract to supply the Iraqi forces was
canceled this year amid protests from competing firms and confusion
surrounding the bidding procedures.

"Nour and ANHAM Joint Venture are proud of our original and
subsequent proposals to equip the Iraqi army," Robert Hoopes,
an ANHAM spokesman, said in a statement. "We are very pleased
to have been selected for this effort, and we look forward to getting
to work to deliver the best quality and value to the Iraqi army and the
American taxpayer."

Army spokeswoman Jan Finegan identified one of ANHAM's component
companies as HAIFinance, founded in part by A. Huda Farouk.
Another is American International Services, of which Farouki is
part-owner. Both were part of the Nour USA consortium.

Farouki is a Washington financier and political donor whose friendship
with Chalabi, now a member of the Iraqi Governing Council, dates
back more than a decade. Chalabi's Petra Bank helped rescue Farouki
from bankruptcy with a series of favorable loans in the 1980s. Chalabi's
Baghdad headquarters was raided by Iraqi security forces last week,
and he was accused of spying for Iran, an allegation he denies. Another
company in the joint venture, Finegan said, is the Munir Sukhtian Group,
a Jordanian conglomerate active throughout the Middle East that was
also part of the previous consortium.

ANHAM's fourth company was identified as ASTRA, the Arab Supply and
Trading Co., based in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. ASTRA, the second-largest
privately owned company in Saudi Arabia, was founded by Sabih Masri,
a Palestinian businessman, according to its website. ASTRA was not
listed as a participating member in the Nour USA bid.

Competitors said late Tuesday that they were considering filing another
round of protests over the award to ANHAM. Several U.S. firms as well as 
companies from U.S. coalition partners had participated in the bidding, 
including General Dynamics, ITT, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, the Polish 
state arms company Bumar and a Spanish consortium, said one source who 
had reviewed documents related to the bidding.

Controversy erupted over Nour's first winning bid of $327 million. It was
unclear how the company was able to undercut its price in winning the new 
award for $259 million."We were shocked," said one competitor, who did not 
want his name used because his firm had not yet decided whether to file a protest. "We're puzzled at how they can develop a price like this."

Army officials in charge of the contracting process could not be reached for
comment late Tuesday.

After several companies filed formal protests over the Nour award, the Army 
determined that the language in its bid documents was confusing. The award was canceled and a new solicitation issued.The confusion prompted sharp criticism from U.S. military commanders and members of Congress, who said the resulting delays endangered Iraqi and American lives by holding up the delivery of equipment needed for the new Iraqi army and civil defense forces.





This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.