One of the most respected newspapers in the US has said it failed to be rigorous enough in some of its coverage in the run-up to the Iraq war.
The New York Times' editors say the paper relied too much on reports from Iraqi opponents of Saddam Hussein without challenging their claims.
They say that in a number of cases the paper had also relied on US officials who were intent on invading Iraq.
They say some of the articles with alarming claims were later discredited.
Going for scoops
The editors say they were not aggressive enough in questioning some of the claims made before the Iraq war about weapons of mass destruction - by Iraqi informants and at times by Bush administration officials.
They say some of the articles they published made alarming allegations, that were either discredited or never verified.
These included the reports about the existence of a secret camp to train Islamic terrorists, hidden facilities where nuclear, chemical and biological weapons were being produced, or how aluminium tubes were proof that Saddam had a secret nuclear-weapons programme.
The editors say that while the original stories were covered prominently, the follow-up stories that called them into question were all too often buried in the back pages.
They say they were partly to blame for perhaps being too intent on getting scoops for the paper when they should have been challenging reporters.
The executive editor at the time these stories were written, Howell Raines, has already resigned.
He stood down last year after it emerged - in the biggest scandal in the paper's history - that a reporter, Jayson Blair, had fabricated or plagiarised dozens of stories.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.