State and Defense department officials took a tongue-lashing today,
trying to explain to a Senate subcommittee how the government has poured
$6 billion since 2002 into building an effective Afghan police force
with disastrous results.
ProPublica and Newsweek examined
the problems  with police
training in Afghanistan in a story published last month. The program,
managed under a contract with DynCorp International, has faced
challenges on every front, from recruitment to inadequate training
periods to corruption to poor officer retention.
"Everything that could go wrong here, has gone wrong," Gordon S.
Heddell, the inspector general of the Department of Defense,
acknowledged to an ad
hoc subcommittee  of the Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Heddell's
office, along with the State Department's Inspector General, completed a
six-month audit in January of the program that found significant
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., the subcommittee chair, and others on the
panel were less interested in rehashing the program's well-known
shortcomings and more interested in hearing about solutions. "What you
laid out was a problem we knew in 2001," said Sen. Edward Kaufman,
D-Del., in response to comments from Heddell. "What are the two or three
things you can spend $6 billion on and not end up with essentially
Defense and State Department officials agreed that clearer guidelines
for the contractor and more oversight are needed to improve the program.
Currently, the State Department has just seven contract overseers in
Afghanistan, said David T. Johnson, an assistant secretary for the State
Department. The agency hopes to have 22 in place by September, Johnson
Another key would be to make training ongoing, rather than just the six
weeks that police recruits are getting now, said David S. Sedney, a
deputy assistant secretary with the Defense Department. "This is not a
weeks- or months-long [process] -- it's a years-long process," he said,
adding that police need to be partnered with American military and more
experienced Afghan troops on whom they can model their behavior.
Even if the program makes headway, some senators questioned whether it
would be sustainable without a massive ongoing commitment from U.S.
taxpayers. The Afghan police and army are slated to receive $11.6
billion to fund their operations for 2011, with just over half going to
the police, Sedney said. McCaskill pointed out that's only $2 billion
less than the entire country's Gross Domestic Product.
"It's obvious that Afghanistan is not going to be able to afford what
we're building for them," she said. The U.S. has made a "billion-dollar
commitment for years to come."
The government is already exploring whether a change in contractors
might benefit the police-training program. DynCorp's contract has been
extended for several months, but the State Department has issued a call
for new bids, hoping an array of companies will step up to compete for
the job, Johnson said. McCaskill was skeptical, however.
"I will be shocked -- like winning the lottery -- if we end up with
anybody other than DynCorp," she said.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.