NEW ORLEANS — A federal appeals court on Wednesday revived lawsuits
against military contractors over a deadly ambush that killed civilian
truck drivers in Iraq.
The suits filed by truckers and their families accuse Halliburton and a
former subsidiary, Houston-based KBR, of knowingly sending a convoy
into a dangerous area where six KBR drivers were killed and several
others wounded on April 9, 2004.
A federal judge in Houston threw out the lawsuits in September 2006,
saying the judiciary can't second-guess the military's battlefield
But the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans reversed that
judge's ruling on Wednesday and sent the three cases back to the lower
court for further proceedings.
A three-judge panel from the appeals court said it may be possible to
resolve the lawsuits without making a "constitutionally impermissible
review of wartime decision-making."
Cases spawned in a war zone involve constitutional issues and
"practical considerations" that can prevent them from being resolved in
court, Judge Leslie Southwick wrote in the panel's 29-page ruling.
"It appears, though, that these tort-based claims of civilian employees
against their civilian employers can be separated from the political
questions that loom so large in the background," Southwick added."
The 5th Circuit said the cases could still run into a constitutional roadblock as they progress.
"The litigation is not yet there, if it ever will be," Southwick wrote.
KBR split from Halliburton last year and operates as a separate,
publicly traded company. At least 110 of KBR's employees have been
killed in Iraq since it started working there under a
multibillion-dollar military contract in 2003.
KBR spokeswoman Heather Browne said the company hadn't seen the ruling yet and couldn't comment on it.
Halliburton spokeswoman Cathy Mann said she couldn't comment on the
ruling because "defense of this lawsuit is KBR's responsibility."
Several lawyers for truck drivers' families didn't immediately return calls for comment Wednesday evening.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.